Tuesday, February 21, 2012

What My Lai Can Tell us About Theories of Group Violence


The massacre in the village of My Lai during the Vietnam War remains one of the blackest marks on the record of the American military.  Over the course of about four hours, the American GIs of the 1st platoon, Charlie Company killed 504 Vietnamese noncombatants of all ages.  Three men, however, attempted to stop the killing.  Hugh Thompson, Jr., Glenn Andreotta, and Lawrence Colburn put themselves between advancing American soldiers and a bunker of Vietnamese civilians, later evacuating them to a South Vietnamese hospital.  In the actions of those soldiers who participated at My Lai we are able to see a clear illustration of many of the points Staub, Milgram, and others make about the nature of mass killing.  In addition, we can look to the varied American response to the actions of Thompson, Andreotta, and Colburn, as well as the Vietnam War in general, as evidence of Mann’s claims about stratified societies and the effect of stratification on the public discussion of war.
The actions of the soldiers of Charlie Company are cited in the epilogue of Stanley Milgram’s Obedience to Authority as a prime example of ordinary men transformed into heartless killers.  In essence, the army, by isolating cadets from potential competing authorities, establishing conformity among the men, and forcing them to accept the dominance and infallibility of military leadership, creates a monolithic society, as defined by Ervin Staub.  “In a monolithic society,” he says, ”there is limited variation in values and perspectives on life…strong authority or totalitarian rule enforces uniformity. The authorities have great power to define reality and shape the people’s perception of the victims.”
Monolithic societies, according to Staub, create an “us-them” mentality, a precondition for extraordinary violence.  In the case of American GIs in Vietnam this mentality was also promoted by differences in race and nationality.  We can link this to Eric Weitz’s “The Modernity of Genocide,” in which he highlights revolutionary movements and race as two factors that create a hospitable environment for mass killing.  It is sometimes forgotten that the Vietnam War was, in fact, a revolution-turned-civil war between North and South Vietnam, with the United States backing South Vietnam.  Although the American troops would not have seen themselves as revolutionaries per se, the conflict itself created “difficult life conditions” as referenced by Staub.  American forces in the field were almost constantly under attack.  Indeed, the night before the My Lai massacre one of Charlie Company’s men was killed by a Viet Cong land mine, and less than a month before My Lai the radio operator and friend of Second Lieutenant William Calley, who led the assault, was killed by a Viet Cong sniper.
            Charlie Company’s attack on My Lai, “justified” as retaliation for the death of their comrades, was also, as Weitz posits of many types of killings, quite ritualized.  The GIs entered an area (a house, or square where peopled had gathered), forced those people in that area to move to a different area (a bunker, well, or ditch) and then fired on them or dropped grenades in with them, and torched all remaining property.  Those Vietnamese who were not killed in a large group were often eviscerated with bayonets, killed while fleeing, or executed while begging for mercy.  These killings lost some of the set ritual of the others, but took on a whole new aspect of performance:  an American soldier encountering a Vietnamese villager killed him or her to show his comrades that he could, and to cement his presence in the group.  Thompson, Andreotta, and Colburn, by insinuating themselves into the situation and trying to stop the violence, interrupted the ritual killings and performances of their fellow GIs and were met with strong opposition from Second Lieutenant Calley, who ordered them away, an order which was refused.  Thompson proceeded to fly twenty Vietnamese civilians to safety in his helicopter as Andreotta and Colburn remained to protect those awaiting rescue. 
            Following the return of Charlie Company to the United States and the eventual revelation of what occurred at My Lai, the reaction of the public was quite mixed.  Few people would argue that Americans were unified in their support of the Vietnam War, and both those who were and those who weren’t were quite vocal and willing to act on their convictions.  “Baby killers” became a disparaging moniker for veterans following the infamous “And babies” interview on national television, and Second Lieutenant Calley was court marshaled and sentenced to life in prison for his part in the massacre.  On the other hand, Thompson received death threats, dead animals left on his doorstep, and calls from congressmen for his court marshaling for being un-patriotic.  Calley was also pardoned by the president two days after his sentencing and spent three years under house arrest and received, among other things, a Mercedes-Benz from a wealthy, anonymous supporter.
            All of these occurrences serve to illustrate some of what Mann says about stratified societies.  In a stratified society, rights have slowly been extended to all groups, generating a climate where conflicts of opinion between groups are legitimized, allowing (ideally) the free expression of political ideas and support.  If the United States had been an organic society, what’s to say that disagreements between hawks and doves wouldn’t have turned into open warfare on the home front as well?
            The events of My Lai, generalized as the assault of a defenseless “other” group by a monolithic society forged by a military and deposited in the middle of a hostile territory, shows us a prototypical example of many of the theories of group motives for mass killing.  The American response, both positive and negative, also shows us how stratification can prevent violent conflict among ourselves, and allows, if not facilitates, public discussion and expression.

Sources:
http://www.usna.edu/Ethics/publications/documents/ThompsonPg1-28_Final.pdf
http://www2.vcdh.virginia.edu/HIUS316/mbase/docs/mylai.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-485983/Found-The-monster-My-Lai-massacre.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTJgMmHZNYQ&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL67E9354D52985F2A
http://books.google.com/books?id=R-QCAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=thompson&f=false 

No comments:

Post a Comment